Usability of a mobile application for health professionals in home care services: a user-centered approach

  • Eysenbach, G. What is e-health?. J. Med. Internet Res. 3(2), e20 (2001).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kao, C.-K. & Liebovitz, D. M. Consumer mobile health Apps: Current state, barriers, and future directions. PM&R 9(5), S106–S115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.018 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Merrell, R. C. & Doarn, C. R. m-Health. Telemed. J. e-Health 20(2), 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.9997 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tsai, C. H. et al. Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: A scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content. Life 10(12), 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10120327 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kruse, C. S. et al. Impact of electronic health records on long-term care facilities: Systematic review. JMIR Med. Inform. 5(3), e35 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Atasoy, H., Greenwood, B. N. & McCullough, J. S. The digitization of patient care: A review of the effects of electronic health records on health care quality and utilization. Annu. Rev. Public Health 40(1), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044206 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alami, H. et al. Rethinking the electronic health record through the quadruple aim: Time to align its value with the health system. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 20(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1048-9 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boccalandro, E. A., Dallari, G. & Mannucci, P. M. Telemedicine and telerehabilitation: Current and forthcoming applications in haemophilia. Blood Transfus. 17(5), 385–390 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kernebeck, S. et al. Impact of mobile health and medical applications on clinical practice in gastroenterology. World J. Gastroenterol. 26(29), 4182–4197 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pires, I. M. et al. A research on the classification and applicability of the mobile health applications. J. Pers. Med. 10(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10010011 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Khairat, S. et al. A mixed-methods evaluation framework for electronic health records usability studies. J. Biomed. Inform. 94, 103175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103175 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cox, C. E. et al. Palliative care planner: A pilot study to evaluate acceptability and usability of an electronic health records system-integrated, needs-targeted app platform. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 15(1), 59–68 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Parmanto, B. et al. iMHere: A novel mHealth system for supporting self-care in management of complex and chronic conditions. JMIR mhealth uhealth 1(2), e10 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seto, E. et al. Perceptions and experiences of heart failure patients and clinicians on the use of mobile phone-based telemonitoring. J. Med. Internet Res. 14(1), e25 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davis, R., Gardner, J. & Schnall, R. A review of usability evaluation methods and their use for testing eHealth HIV interventions. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 17(3), 203–218 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jaspers, M. W. M. A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78(5), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Llorens-Vernet, P. & Miró, J. Standards for mobile health–related apps: Systematic review and development of a guide. JMIR mHealth uHealth 8(3), e13057 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Inal, Y., Wake, J. D., Guribye, F. & Nordgreen, T. Usability evaluations of mobile mental health technologies: Systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 22(1), e15337 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harrison, R., Flood, D. & Duce, D. Usability of mobile applications: Literature review and rationale for a new usability model. J. Interact. Sci. 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2194-0827-1-1 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Almeida, A. F., Rocha, N. P. & Silva, A. G. Methodological quality of manuscripts reporting on the usability of mobile applications for pain assessment and management: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(3), 785. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030785 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kampmeijer, R., Pavlova, M., Tambor, M., Golinowska, S. & Groot, W. The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 16(S5), 290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1522-3 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Georgsson, M. A review of usability methods used in the evaluation of mobile health applications for diabetes. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 4(273), 228–233 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Alessa, T., Hawley, M. S., Hock, E. S. & de Witte, L. Smartphone apps to support self-management of hypertension: Review and content analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth 7(5), e13645 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Veazie, S. et al. Rapid evidence review of mobile applications for self-management of diabetes. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 33(7), 1167–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4410-1 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aranda-Jan, C. B., Mohutsiwa-Dibe, N. & Loukanova, S. Systematic review on what works, what does not work and why of implementation of mobile health (mHealth) projects in Africa. BMC Public Health 14(1), 188. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-188 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Free, C. et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 10(1), e1001363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de la Vega, R. & Miró, J. mHealth: A strategic field without a solid scientific soul. A systematic review of pain-related apps. PLoS ONE 9(7), e101312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101312 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maramba, I., Chatterjee, A. & Newman, C. Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 126, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Larbi, D. et al. Methods and evaluation criteria for apps and digital interventions for diabetes self-management: Systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 22(7), e18480 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brender McNair, J. Theoretical basis of health IT evaluation. Stud Health Technol. Inform. 222, 39–52 (2016).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lyles, C. R., Sarkar, U. & Osborn, C. Y. Getting a technology-based diabetes intervention ready for prime time: A review of usability testing studies. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 14(10), 534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-014-0534-9 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diaz Gegundez, M., Manzano Monfort, G., Garcia Vilches, J., Gomez de Argila, I. Implementación de una Aplicación móvil para trabajar con la Historia Clínica Electrónica de los pacientes en domicilio Hosp a Domic 3(3):203. https://doi.org/10.22585/hospdomic.v3i3.80 (2019).

  • Cho, H., Yen, P.-Y., Dowding, D., Merrill, J. A. & Schnall, R. A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study. J. Biomed. Inform. 86, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.08.012 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abran, A., Khelifi, A. & Suryn, W. Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards. Softw. Qual. J. 11, 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025869312943 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rahimi, B., Nadri, H., Lotfnezhad Afshar, H. & Timpka, T. A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Appl. Clin. Inform. 09(03), 604–634. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668091 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • American Medical Association | AMA. https://www.ama-assn.org/.

  • Aguilar, MIH., González, A de la G., Miranda, MPS. & Villegas, AAG. Adaptación al español del cuestionario de usabilidad de sistemas informáticos CSUQ/Spanish language adaptation of the computer systems usability questionnaire CSUQ. RECI Rev Iberoam las Ciencias Comput e Informática. 4(8), 84–99 (2016).

  • Alroobaea, R. & Mayhew, P. J. How many participants are really enough for usability studies? In: 2014 Science and Information Conference IEEE 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAI.2014.6918171 (2014)

  • van der Weegen, S., Verwey, R., Tange, H., Spreeuwenberg, M. & de Witte, L. Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity. Patient Prefer Adherence 8, 311–322 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hochstenbach, L. M. J., Zwakhalen, S. M. G., Courtens, A. M., van Kleef, M. & de Witte, L. P. Feasibility of a mobile and web-based intervention to support self-management in outpatients with cancer pain. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 23, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2016.03.009 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arrue, M., Fajardo, I., Lopez, J. M. & Vigo, M. Interdependence between technical web accessibility and usability: Its influence on web quality models. Int. J. Web Eng. Technol. 3(3), 307. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWET.2007.012059 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Swann, M. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDT’s). https://www.ergonomic.solutions/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ISO9241Summary.pdf

  • Lewis, J. R. Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. Int. J.Hum. Comput. Interact. 14(3–4), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2002.9669130 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Middleton, B. et al. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: Recommendations from AMIA. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 20(e1), e2-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001458 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ratwani, R. M., Zachary Hettinger, A., Kosydar, A., Fairbanks, R. J. & Hodgkins, M. L. A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 24(e1), e35–e39. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw092 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Holden, R. J. & Karsh, B.-T. The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. J. Biomed. Inform. 43(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ammenwerth, E. Technology acceptance models in health informatics: TAM and UTAUT. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 30(263), 64–71 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, J.-H., Wang, S.-C. & Lin, L.-M. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.006 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dünnebeil, S., Sunyaev, A., Blohm, I., Leimeister, J. M. & Krcmar, H. Determinants of physicians’ technology acceptance for e-health in ambulatory care. Int. J. Med. Inform. 81(11), 746–760 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bradway, M. et al. mHealth assessment: Conceptualization of a global framework. JMIR mHealth uHealth 5(5), e60 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, S., Lee, K.-H., Hwang, H. & Yoo, S. Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals’ adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 30(16), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0249-8 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gannon, B. et al. A mobile sexual health app on empowerment, education, and prevention for young adult men (MyPEEPS Mobile): Acceptability and usability evaluation. JMIR Form. Res. 4(4), e17901 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prgomet, M., Georgiou, A. & Westbrook, J. I. The impact of mobile handheld technology on hospital physicians’ work practices and patient care: A systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 16(6), 792–801. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M3215 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar